Connect with us

Parliament

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY MADNESS: BUHARI’S POLITICAL WEAKNESS AND HIS PRESIDENCY FUTURE

Published

on

Inibehe Effiong

The protracted scandalous impasse and controversy over the emergence of the Senate President and the Speaker of the House of Representatives and selection of other principal officers of the current National Assembly which escalated into fisticuff on Thursday June 25, 2015 in the House of Representatives evinces that our country is yet to be freed from the clutches of evil forces and imperial elements. We are back to the trenches of national ruination orchestrated by the egregious activities and aspirations of unpatriotic racketeers whose insatiable inclinations takes precedence over the collective good of our country.

There is no moral prescription that justifies the contemptuous treatment of the APC by it renegade legislators. The argument that the party cannot dictate who should be the Leader, Deputy Leader, Chief Whip and Deputy Chief Whip of both houses is not only untenable but preposterous. Precedents shows that it is the Party Caucus of both houses that determines those that should occupy positions that are exclusively reserved for the party in the majority and minority as the case may be. If this is the case, the relevant question is: what is the decision of the majority in the APC Caucus in both the Senate and the House of Representatives? Since those who occupy these offices are invariably representing their political party, does the APC not have the right to determine, influence or at least set parameters for the emergence of those that should represent it?

Can one become a Majority Leader for instance without being in the PARTY that has the majority of members in the house? The answer is obviously in the negative. So how can anyone say that the occupation of these offices are not to be dictated based on political party consideration? What has been the practice in the past? How did Sen. Victor Ndoma Egba emerge as the Leader of the 7th Senate? Was it not the decision of the PDP leadership and the PDP Caucus in the Senate then? Was it not the insistence of the PDP that enabled the emergence of Mrs. Mulikat Akande as the Leader of the 7th House of Representatives after she had contested against Tambuwal and lost despite being the official candidate of the PDP.

It is true that Tambuwal emerged contrary to the wishes of his party at the time, principally because of the support he got from the then opposition APC. However, we need to advert our minds to the fact that that only happened because the election (voting) of a Speaker is constitutionally open to to all members of the House, irrespective of political party affiliation. However, it is on record that despite being the wish of majority of members of the then House, the then PDP federal government of Goodluck Jonathan refused to accord Aminu Tambuwal recognition after he joined the APC. His official security was withdrawn by a lawless and partisan Inspector General of Police without any supporting order of a court of competent jurisdiction declaring his seat vacant.

I therefore find the press release issued by the PDP condemning President Buhari and the APC for their insistence on party supremacy as hypocritical, insulting and baseless. It is nauseating for the PDP, the very party that destroyed this country and derailed our democratic process, to be talking about democracy when they have not yet demonstrated remorse for raping our country mindlessly for 16 years. PDP should first re – brand her terrible image before building a structure for constructive, objective and mature opposition nurtured by truth, accountability and justice.

If the present revolt against the APC is nemesis for the past support given to Tambuwal by the APC, that nemesis should have ended after the emergence of Bukola Saraki and Yakubu Dogara as Senate President and Speaker of the House of Representatives respectively, contrary to the wishes of their party. It is offensive to the ethos of political practice and the principles of party supremacy for Saraki and Dogara and their fellow renegade legislators to disregard the wishes of the party on whose glory and momentum they rode to power. It is unacceptable.

While it is true that the legislators have the right to determine those who should lead them in various capacities, it should be noted that they were all elected on the platform of political parties. The present constitutional regime does not accommodate independent candidacy. The responsibility of the political parties did not cease upon their election into the National Assembly. Political parties do not merely exist to enable politicians win elections and actualise their political ambitions.

The relationship between the parties and their candidates does not stop because of electoral victory. It continues and subsist throughout the currency of the elected members’ tenure. Therefore, I cannot decipher why some members of the APC in the National Assembly will totally disregard the wishes, feelings and views of the very party on whose platform they were elected in the first place. There is nothing undemocratic in the APC writing to Saraki and Dogara on those they prefer as principal officers that should represent the party in the National Assembly. More so when majority of the APC Caucus in both houses are in support of the party’s position on the matter.

Some have contended that it is undemocratic for the APC to express her preferences for the principal offices, and I ask: is there a democratic way of passing faeces? What the APC has done to my mind is basically an attempt to maintain cohesion in the party which may be endangered if the individual aspirations of the members is not checked. I am not a member of the APC, but I cannot understand why the likes of Dino Melaye who could not secure his reelection to the House of Representatives in 2011 will now be leading a revolt against the very party on whose glory he rode to victory in 2015. It is not activism but the height of ingratitude.

It is deeply saddening that the oasis of hope which herald the emergence of the Muhammadu Buhari presidency is diminishing daily with its attendant destructive effects on the polity and the nation. It is a sad commentary that the leadership and members of the ruling APC in the National Assembly have not exuded the discipline expected of them. One would have expected that the APC will deliberately obviate the reoccurrence of the blunders, cancerous modus operandi and dictatorial proclivities of the PDP which ultimately led to the PDP’s defeat in the historic 2015 presidential poll.

Beyond the crisis over the leadership of the National Assembly is a worrisome and frightening possibility; the Buhari presidency may in the final analysis be undermined and fatally derailed. If things remain the way they are in the National Assembly, I see a very challenging future for president Buhari. We cannot continue to deny the fact that some very corrupt characters supported and funded the election of Buhari and the APC. These characters cannot guarantee the security of their illicit lucre if they do not have a strong hold on the current government. They know that without access to the powers that be, they may not survive the expected onslaught against corruption in the country.

Looking at the present crisis in the National Assembly, one can see the hands of these money bags. It is also a truism that some of the current crop of lawmakers in the National Assembly are among the most vicious and corrupt people in Nigeria. For example, do we expect some former governors who looted their states to a halt and sought refuge in the Senate to just sit back and allow a decent or saner leadership to emerge in the Senate?

There is no need for prevarication, Buhari cannot fight corruption or transform the country without putting in place the required legislative framework. Certain laws will need to be enacted or amended. Actions of men are mostly actuated by the need for self – preservation. Corruption cannot fight corruption nor can the corrupt make laws against corruption.

It is this possibility that makes the “I belong to nobody” attitude of president Buhari in the circumstance unacceptable to some of us. How can our president be sitting in the presidential villa singing “I belong to nobody” when a structure is being laid to frustrate his presidency? Does Buhari think that we are still in the military era when the Head of State can just wake up in the morning and issue a Decree to accomplish his purpose?. Is the president not aware that the National Assembly, though an independent arm of government, will play a vital and even indispensable role in the attainment of his much touted change?

Now that the National Assembly leadership has merged with the PDP that was rejected by Nigerians at the polls and other anti – change elements, what becomes of president Buhari? I do not know those advising Buhari, but they are leading him to a very vulnerable future. The change that the Nigerian people voted for seems to have been hijacked by a monstrous and corrupt cabal that is determined to truncate the change, development and anti – corruption mantra of Buhari’s presidency and return our country to the era of the locusts.

The president needs to rise up to the urgency of now. By virtue of his position, Buhari is the leader of his party. The APC should immediately assert it authority and restore discipline, even if it will entail expelling some people from the party. President Barrack Obama wouldn’t have succeeded in having the historic medical care for all legislation (Obamacare) passed by the American Congress if the Democrats in Congress were not strongly on his side during the heated debates on the law.

That Buhari is sleeping comfortably while the very party that brought him to power is being destroyed is not a sign of responsible leadership. If this is naivety, then it is the worse type of it. Belonging to nobody does not mean committing political suicide.

The time to act is now.

Email: inibehe.effiong@gmail.com

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Parliament

The Working Poor: Why Millions of Nigerians Are Employed Yet Trapped In Poverty

Published

on

Oche Nehi

There was a time in Nigeria when securing a job marked the beginning of a better life. Employment meant stability, dignity, and hope. Parents sacrificed everything to educate their children because they believed a certificate would open the door to prosperity. That social contract has now been broken.

Today, millions of Nigerians rise before dawn, endure hours of traffic, work eight to twelve hours daily, and still return home unable to provide decent meals, pay school fees, settle rent, or save for tomorrow. They are not unemployed. They are not lazy. They are victims of an economy that increasingly punishes honest labour while rewarding political privilege.
Nigeria has quietly created a new class of citizens the WORKING POOR.
This silent emergency deserves as much national attention as unemployment, insecurity, and corruption because it is gradually eroding the dignity of work itself.
Across ministries, hospitals, schools, banks, factories, media houses, security agencies, and private businesses, countless workers now live from one salary to the next. For many, the salary is exhausted within days of payment. The remaining weeks are financed through borrowing, cooperative societies, digital loan apps, family support, or pure endurance.

The consequences are visible everywhere.

  1. A teacher who educates the nation’s future cannot afford quality education for her own children.
  2. A nurse entrusted with saving lives struggles to pay hospital bills when illness strikes her family.
  3. A police officer charged with protecting society battles to feed his household.
  4. A journalist exposing corruption cannot afford decent housing.
  5. A junior civil servant, after paying rent, transportation, electricity bills, food, and other essentials, is left with little or nothing before the next payday.

These are not isolated stories. They represent a growing national reality.
The tragedy is that Nigerians are working harder than ever before, but getting poorer with every passing year.

The reasons are not difficult to identify. Inflation has steadily reduced the value of wages. Food prices have reached levels unimaginable just a few years ago. Transportation costs have surged. House rents continue to climb in major cities. Electricity tariffs and other basic living expenses consume increasing portions of household income. Yet salaries particularly in the public sector and among lower-income workers in the private sector have failed to keep pace with these rising costs. The result is predictable: employment no longer guarantees economic security.
This should alarm every policymaker.


When workers can no longer afford the basic necessities of life despite full-time employment, productivity declines, corruption becomes more tempting, brain drain accelerates, and public confidence in government weakens.

Perhaps the greatest danger psychological. A generation that believes hard work no longer leads to progress is a generation that begins to lose faith in legitimate enterprise. It is no coincidence that more young Nigerians now dream of leaving the country than building careers within it. They are not simply chasing higher salaries abroad; they are searching for societies where effort is rewarded and work restores dignity.

At SecretsReporters, we believe this crisis cannot be separated from governance. While governments at various levels have introduced reforms intended to stabilize the economy and improve public finances, ordinary Nigerians continue to judge success by what happens in their kitchens, not by what appears in policy documents. Economic reforms that fail to translate into improved living conditions will inevitably face questions from the citizens they are meant to benefit.

This is why accountability must extend beyond budget speeches and official statistics. It must answer a more fundamental question:

Why are Nigerians working harder but living poorer? The answer demands honesty. It requires confronting inflation, improving productivity, investing in affordable public transportation, expanding access to quality healthcare and housing, supporting businesses that create decent jobs, and ensuring that wage policies reflect the real cost of living.

It also requires government at every level to recognise that development cannot be measured solely by infrastructure projects or macroeconomic indicators. A nation succeeds when ordinary workers can afford food, educate their children, access healthcare without financial ruin, and retire with dignity.

Employment should be the strongest weapon against poverty not another expression of it.

The working poor are not asking for luxury. They are asking for fairness. They seek an economy where honest work can provide a decent life and where sacrifice is rewarded with opportunity rather than perpetual hardship. Nigeria cannot continue to celebrate employment figures while ignoring the quality of life of those who are employed. A job that cannot feed a family, pay rent, or meet basic human needs is no longer a pathway out of poverty it is evidence of a deeper structural failure.

As this newspaper has consistently maintained, the true wealth of any nation is not measured by the fortunes of a privileged few but by the dignity enjoyed by its ordinary citizens. The millions of Nigerians who keep this country running teachers, nurses, artisans, factory workers, journalists, drivers, civil servants, farmers, traders, and security personnel deserve more than applause for their resilience. They deserve an economy that values their labour. The greatest injustice in today’s Nigeria is not merely that many people cannot find jobs.
It is that millions who already have jobs are still living in poverty.

That should trouble every leader. And it should trouble every Nigerian.

Continue Reading

Parliament

Prof Muhammad Ali Pate: From Bold Promises to Underdelivery

Published

on

By Barau Simon (Dantani Jr)

When he took office as the Minister of Health and Social Welfare Prof. Muhammad Ali Pate made a bold promise: to “Save Lives, Produce Health, and do it for all Nigerians.

But as bold as his promises are and were, the decline of the Nigerian health sector, as well as the dwindling of it, has shown that the Minister’s assertion while taking office was just mere words and rhetoric and has not at any point translated into realities and achievements of any sort.

A cursory look at the just-verbalized four-pillar agenda he dished out to revamp the health system shows that, rather than delivering, the health system has been in a comatose state.

What he promised and what the reality is at the moment:

He promised the health governance and synergy, pledging to coordinate the three tiers of government, the health sector has continued to battle a historical lack of synergy between federal, state, and local governments, fragmentation has been the word that is existing in this sector, as it is this has brutally hampered primary healthcare (PHC) delivery, resulting in overloaded tertiary hospitals, poor funding, and inadequate supply of medical staff and supplies across rural communities.

On the ground, realities prove that the “lack of synergy” remains an ongoing hurdle, which is a slap on the minister’s promise of health governance synergy. Under him, stakeholders have often pointed out that needs assessments of the community are hardly or not even synchronised, an act that has led to duplications in some areas and complete neglect of medical facilities in others.

Again, he promised Primary Healthcare (PHC) and Maternal Health, the minister’s assertion to focus on expanding and revitalizing grassroots primary care to ensure basic services—such as routine vaccines and maternal health facilities—are available to everyone has remained a mirage; nothing has been achieved further than what was achieved in the previous governments.

As of today, the primary healthcare (PHC) system in Nigeria is relentlessly constrained, with only about 20% of the over 30,000 PHC facilities deemed fully functional. There is little or no funding, and the continuous massive brain drain of medical professionals, dilapidated infrastructure, and severe shortages of essential drugs and medical equipment remain unchanged.

The case of six in ten Nigerians lacking access to quality primary health care service remains as it is, there has not been any improvement under the current minister and with the basic primary facilities lacking delivery tools, emergency interventions, and skilled midwives, treatable pregnancy complications regularly turn fatal, particularly for women and newborns in rural communities, and so far so long, maternal and child mortality has remained even high more than the way it is before he took saddle on the position as the minister.

Suffice to say that the Nigerian health sector, under the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare Prof. Muhammad Ali Pate, instead of soaring high like what he promised when he took office, is rather plummeting, and this is shown in terms of severe infrastructural decay, paralyzing labor strikes, and systemic vulnerabilities that have continued.

‎Key areas that show failure in the health sector under Ali Pate

Decay of Facilities
Little or no funding has left tertiary health institutions brutally derelict, as seen in the dilapidation of diagnostic and laboratory facilities within them, which has shifted the weight of apt medical investigations to costly private hands.

Labour Strike and Crisis of Human Resources
There have been a series of strikes embarked by health workers and medical personnel under Ali Pate as Minister of Health. More so, there have been obnoxious policies that have exacerbated the human resource crisis and sped the “brain drain” of medical professionals leaving the country in droves.

They are as follows;

Non-payment of Entitlements: The health sector has been plagued by incessant and interminable strikes by medical workers, including the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD), the Joint Health Sector Unions (JOHESU), demanding the implementation of the Consolidated Health Salary Structure (CONHESS).

The Minister’s “No Work, No Pay” Policy: Under the Minister’s leadership, his ministry enforced an abhorrent rule of a “no work, no pay” for striking health professionals, a posture health sector critics argued has worsened the human resource crisis and sped the “brain drain” of medical professionals leaving the country in their numbers.

Professor Muhammad Ali Pate’s enforcement of the “no work, no pay” rule for striking health workers—particularly during the prolonged 2025–2026 Joint Health Sector Unions (JOHESU) industrial action over the Consolidated Health Salary Structure (CONHESS)—severely disrupted public healthcare delivery.

Service Disruption: The policy failed to deter unions like JOHESU, which represents roughly 85% of the healthcare workforce. Workers continued their strike, forcing public hospitals to close or operate at heavily reduced capacities, leading to delayed treatments, postponed surgeries, and compromised patient care.

Worsening Brain Drain: Financial pressures, combined with a lack of hazard allowances and delayed wage negotiations, are accelerating the exodus of vital health workers. This “japa” wave leaves the remaining public hospitals critically understaffed.

Deteriorating Sector Morale: The enforcement of this rule—which was applied to some unions but selectively missed for others—has bred feelings of marginalization and institutional disrespect. Experts warn that these execution gaps and disputes undermine trust in the government’s ability to manage health system reforms.

Increased Out-Of-Pocket Costs: With public hospitals paralyzed by these labor disputes, vulnerable Nigerians have been forced to bear the high, out-of-pocket costs of seeking care at private clinics.

The hidden cost of these prolonged labor disputes ultimately cripples the population’s access to care, with citizens bearing the brunt of the instability.

How Health Policies Are Fragmentally Executed As Gaps Exist In Policy Implementation

Feeble and Weak Execution: for instance, health sector Groups like Corporate Accountability and Public Participation Africa (CAPPA) have mentioned failures to execute health funding policies as a reason for frequent expenses and overdue care for patients.

Struggles within the State Level: Despite policies being made, the Nigerian Health sector critics are of the view that even with reforms and policies, little or nothing has been implemented successfully in the states.

Continuous Brain Drain Syndrome Under The Minister
In February 2025, the Minister of Health for the State, Professor Iziaq Salako, reechoed what his boss, Professor Ali Pate, has consistently said of stopping the brain drain syndrome, popularly known as japa syndrome.

But the reforms under the Minister of Health Professor Ali Pate have failed to arrest or stop the japa syndrome, even with targets to increase local medical manpower and retain professionals. Persistent inflation, poor remuneration, and challenging working conditions have continued to drive record numbers of Nigerian health workers to migrate.

Critics and unions argue these measures do not address the root causes of the japa wave, they said poor foundational salaries and systemic lack of infrastructure continue as the primary drivers of the brain drain.

Non-payment of entitlements, policy somersault has continued to cause industrial actions by health and medical personnel.

Timeline of strikes under the current Minister of Health

Under the tenure of the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Ali Pate, the Nigerian Association of Resident Doctors (NARD) engaged in a prolonged strike in late 2025 and issued several ultimatums in 2026 over unfulfilled welfare and allowance agreements.

The timeline of major NARD industrial actions and agreements under his administration includes:
•July 2023: NARD embarked on a nationwide, indefinite strike over unfulfilled salary and allowance demands. The action lasted until mid-August.

In November 2023, President Bola Tinubu approved the waiver of the “No Work, No Pay” order against the doctors.

•September 2025: NARD issued a 30-day ultimatum to the Federal Government regarding lingering welfare issues, specifically the non-disbursement of the 2023 Medical Residency Training Fund and unpaid arrears.

•November 1, 2025: Following the expiration of ultimatums, NARD began a “total, comprehensive and indefinite” nationwide strike over overwhelming workloads, unpaid salary arrears, and poor hospital infrastructure.

•November 29–30, 2025: NARD signed a 19-item Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the Federal Government. The union’s National Executive Council voted to suspend the 29-day strike to allow government ministries to fulfill commitments.

•January 12, 2026: NARD resumed its indefinite strike, citing the Ministry of Health’s failure to implement provisions from the November MoU (such as correcting professional allowance errors and reinstating dismissed union leaders in Lokoja) and the enforcement of a “no work, no pay” policy.

•February 2026: The broader health sector experienced significant friction, as JOHESU embarked on a strike.

•April 7, 2026: NARD initiated another nationwide indefinite strike due to protracted pay disputes and the government’s attempts to halt the newly revised Professional Allowance Table (PAT).

•April 8, 2026: Following high-level interventions by Vice President Kashim Shettima and Minister Pate, NARD suspended its indefinite strike after the government committed to restoring the revised allowance table.

Under Professor Ali Pate as Health Minister, the Joint Health Sector Unions (JOHESU) embarked on two major industrial disputes and other ones all these are primarily driven by demands for the implementation of the adjusted Consolidated Health Salary Structure (CONHESS) and other welfare packages.

A timeline of these actions:
•June 2023: Health workers embarked on a 12-day nationwide strike. The action was suspended after a direct intervention by President Tinubu, who requested a 21-day timeline to resolve the unions’ demands. [1]
•November 2025 – February 2026: Following prolonged stalemates regarding the full implementation of the adjusted CONHESS, JOHESU declared an indefinite nationwide strike on November 15, 2025. The strike paralyzed public tertiary and secondary health institutions nationwide.
•January 2026: The Federal Government invoked the “No Work, No Pay” policy in an attempt to force striking health workers back to their duties, a move the union strongly resisted.

•February 2026: Following successful conciliation meetings in Abuja with the Federal Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, JOHESU officially suspended their 84-day nationwide strike on February 6, 2026.

Also under him, the National Association of Nigerian Nurses and Midwives (NANNM) has embarked different strikes action over disputes that centers on salary structure adjustments, inadequate staffing, and unpaid allowances.

A detailed timeline of these actions is as follows:
July–August 2025: Nationwide Warning Strike
•July 14, 2025: Nurses issued a 15-day ultimatum to the federal government citing poor remuneration, staff shortages, and unresolved welfare issues. [1, 2]
•July 30, 2025: Following the expiration of the ultimatum, nurses commenced a 7-day nationwide warning strike that temporarily paralyzed health services at 74 federal hospitals, state facilities, and primary health centers. [1, 2]
•August 3, 2025: NANNM suspended the warning strike after the federal government signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with agreed-upon timelines for addressing key demands, including the gazetting of a new scheme of service and finalizing the upward review of allowances.

Mid-2026: Continued Unrest and Negotiations
•May–June 2026: Lingering distress over delayed allowances, coupled with Nursing and Midwifery Council of Nigeria (NMCN) certificate delays, continued to generate unrest in the sector. Negotiations over the new allowance structures and demands to implement full agreements remain ongoing, with unions frequently warning of further industrial action to press home their demands.

Grants Received

As the Coordinating Minister of Health and Social Welfare, Prof. Muhammad Ali Pate, Nigeria has received and facilitated over $4.6 billion in foreign health grants and investments. Key international funding received under his tenure includes:

• Global Fund: An allocated $933 million grant for the implementation period spanning across 2024 to 2026 to combat HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria.

• United States Government: A nearly $2 billion grant commitment to support Nigeria’s health priorities, specifically focusing on antiretroviral therapies, malaria, and maternal/child health.

• International Investment & Localization: Over $5.5 billion in foreign investments have been secured to build local pharmaceutical and healthcare manufacturing capacity, including financing from the European Investment Bank and Afreximbank.

Despite grants received, cases such as Malaria, Tuberculosis has remained high. Nigeria remains vulnerable to recurring disease outbreaks, exposing the weakness of its healthcare system.

Nigeria’s health sector remains fragile despite the Minister’s so much talk of bold promises and what he has achieved under the sector that are nowhere to be seen.
Even with his policy and reforms the persistence of challenges still rearing their ugly heads health sector raises questions about his capacity to improve healthcare in Nigeria as he has claimed he will do.

For instance at the 2025 Strategic Health Summit, health advocates assessed the sector’s progress and acknowledged that significant gaps persist.

Ali Pate’s approach to healthcare sector where he superintend as the Minister has become a mix of broken promises and penny-pinching. The consequence is simple and brutal. For Nigerians, visiting a public hospital has become a gamble. Will you see a doctor? Will the lab be open? Will the nurse be available? Will the strike still be on?

And even if you are lucky, you are likely to meet exhausted professionals carrying the weight of a system that refuses to support them.

This is the state of our public healthcare under the current Minister.

Continue Reading

Parliament

Muhammad Ali Pate and Bill Gates: Their Grand plan to depopulate Nigeria

Published

on

Dr David Ejiofor

To understand why Nigeria’s Minister of health Prof Muhammad Ali Pate has an umbilical like linkage to Bill Gates one will have to unravel the motive behind the multimillion dollar support from Gates foundation, the reason may not be far fetched over the years experts have theorized that Gates has been behind harmful medical experimentation around population control in Africa and Nigeria especially. And Pate is his gateway to ensure a massive population control. To stop Nigeria from becoming the third most populous country by 2050. This may sound far fetched to the undiscerning but there’s a precedence to this.

Public skepticism toward foreign-funded medical initiatives in Nigeria cannot be understood without reference to the 1996 Pfizer Trovan trial in Kano. During a meningitis outbreak that claimed thousands of lives, Pfizer tested the experimental antibiotic Trovan on children. Subsequent investigations and legal disputes raised serious concerns regarding informed consent procedures, ethical approvals, and research oversight. The controversy left a lasting impact on public trust and remains one of the most cited examples of ethical failures in medical research conducted in developing countries.

The legacy of the Trovan case continues to shape public perceptions of international health interventions. For many Nigerians, it serves as a reminder of the need for rigorous safeguards whenever foreign-funded research or medical programs involve Nigerian citizens.

Western-sponsored vaccines have thus become tools for population control with Gates Foundation at the forefront. More recently, discussions on social media and other online platforms have revived concerns about transparency, accountability, and oversight in international health collaborations. While various claims and allegations have circulated online, many remain unverified and should be treated with caution unless supported by credible evidence and official investigations.

Nevertheless, the broader questions raised by citizens deserve serious consideration. Nigerians have a legitimate interest in knowing that all medical research, health interventions, and international partnerships affecting their wellbeing are conducted in accordance with the highest ethical standards.

In this regard, health policy experts emphasize the importance of strong regulatory institutions, informed consent procedures, independent ethical review boards, and transparent government oversight. Public confidence in healthcare initiatives depends not only on scientific effectiveness but also on trust, accountability, and respect for human dignity.

A few months ago verified emails, circulated online analyzing and measuring women’s bodies and possible medical imaging. Among these were email exchanges said to be between Epstein and the same Gates, where specifically mentioned Nigeria and their anatomy, in which he was reportedly requested to bring women from Nigeria, with suspicions raised that parts of their bodies might be used for activities linked to potential research that may be contravenes the Nuremberg code of medical research ethics.

For many observers, the debate is ultimately about safeguarding the rights of citizens under principles that have guided medical ethics since the Nuremberg Code. No foreign-funded research involving Nigerians should proceed without fully informed consent, rigorous ethical scrutiny, and transparent government oversight. Anything less risks undermining public trust and repeating mistakes that history has already warned against.

As Nigeria deepens its engagement with global health partners, the challenge is not to reject international cooperation but to ensure that such partnerships operate under robust safeguards that protect the rights and interests of Nigerian citizens. Transparency, public accountability, and ethical compliance must remain at the heart of every health intervention conducted within the country.

Ultimately, the debate reflects a broader global issue: how nations can benefit from international scientific collaboration while maintaining sovereignty, public trust, and rigorous protection of their citizens.

Continue Reading

Trending

Support Independent News